Can carbon dioxide help with nasal allergies?
Sep 7, 2011, 11:26 a.m.
By Amy Norton
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - A shot of carbon dioxide to the nose may bring some quick, though short-lived, relief to people with nasal allergies, a preliminary study suggests.
So-called intranasal carbon dioxide (CO2) is not yet an approved treatment for nasal allergies. The new study is one of a number of clinical trials being funded by Capnia, Inc., a Palo Alto, California-based company that is developing a hand-held device that -- if approved -- would allow people to administer the CO2 therapy to themselves.
In the new study, researchers recruited 348 adults with year-round nasal allergies -- to irritants like dust, mold or pet dander.
They randomly assigned participants to have either one dose of CO2, delivered via a nosepiece attached to a CO2 cylinder, or a placebo "treatment" where nothing was delivered through the nosepiece.
Those receiving the real treatment were further divided into four groups, receiving either a lower or higher CO2 dose for either 10 seconds or 30 seconds.
About 30 minutes later, one of the CO2 groups -- the one getting the higher dose for 10 seconds -- reported bigger improvements in nasal congestion, itching, sneezing and watery eyes than those getting the placebo.
The advantage lasted about four hours, according to findings published in the Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.
The degree of symptom improvement was similar to what's typically seen with standard treatments like antihistamine nasal sprays, according to lead researcher Dr. Thomas B. Casale, a professor of medicine at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska.
If approved, intranasal CO2 could offer an alternative to people with seasonal or year-round nasal allergies, Casale told Reuters Health.
Prescription nasal sprays with anti-inflammatory corticosteroids, taken regularly, are the most effective treatment out there, Casale said. But some people -- including parents of young children with nasal allergies -- are reluctant to use steroids, even though the low doses in allergy nasal sprays are generally considered safe.
"There are still a lot of people who don't like to take medication," Casale said, "and might view this as a 'natural' treatment."
Because the treatment is still experimental, it is not clear how much it would cost if it makes it to the market.
An allergy expert not involved in the study was unimpressed with the results.
Even if the symptom reduction is around what's seen with antihistamine nasal sprays, the latter have longer-lasting effects, according to Dr. Harold Nelson, an allergist at National Jewish Health, a Denver hospital that specializes in respiratory diseases.
One dose is good for 24 hours, Nelson said in an interview with Reuters Health, whereas the benefits of intranasal CO2 wore off after 4 to 6 hours in this study.
On top of that, he added, intranasal CO2 "seems uncomfortable."
Of all CO2 patients in the study, upwards of 80 percent said they had nasal discomfort during the treatment -- versus just about eight percent in the placebo group. Around one-quarter became teary-eyed, and 14 percent to 20 percent developed headaches.